The Calculus of Resistance: Strategic Restraint in the Age of Project 2025

In the crucible of 2025, with Project 2025’s sweeping policies threatening civil liberties under the guise of “restoration,” Black Americans are confronting an old question with a new answer: When is marching forward actually stepping into a trap?

What emerges today is not silence, but a calculated refusal to participate in performative resistance. Guided by AI-powered predictive analytics, I have modeled three potential protest-response scenarios had national demonstrations occurred between April 5 and May 31, 2025. What the data reveals is sobering—and clarifying. Restraint is not retreat; it’s a revolutionary strategy.

1. COVID-19 Protest Paradox: A Lens on Past Disparities

Before unpacking 2025, we revisit 2020: a year that laid bare the racial double standard in protest policing.

Anti-Lockdown Protests:
Predominantly white, right-wing demonstrations emerged in opposition to COVID-19 restrictions. These gatherings, often armed and defiant, were rarely disrupted by police, despite violating public health orders. They posed an outsized risk to Black communities already disproportionately affected by the pandemic. [Vox]
BLM Uprisings:
Sparked by the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and others, these protests—multiracial but Black-led—became the largest social movement in U.S. history. Despite being overwhelmingly peaceful (93%), they were met with militarized responses: 14,000+ arrests, widespread tear gas use, and mass surveillance. [ACLED]
[Guardian]
[NIH]

This juxtaposition exposed a truth that haunts us still: White defiance is coddled; Black dissent is crushed.

2. Project 2025 and the Engineered Chaos Hypothesis

As Project 2025 dismantles consent decrees, expands surveillance, and empowers privatized incarceration, it also primes the system for reactionary overreach. Predictive models indicate a high probability that mass protests would trigger severe responses—possibly manufactured to justify authoritarian escalation.

Historical Pattern Recognition:
In 2020, despite peaceful protests, 42% of Americans believed BLM was inciting violence—a narrative engineered by media distortion and amplified by right-wing pundits.
Infiltration by provocateurs, including far-right actors, was documented as a means to discredit movements. [ACLED]
[Guardian NZ]
False Flag Risk:
In the most extreme scenario, the models suggest a significant likelihood of a staged or misattributed violent act (false flag) being used to justify a quasi-martial law declaration. This would mirror tactics historically used to delegitimize Black movements and instate emergency powers under false pretenses.

3. Predictive Scenarios: A Data-Informed Defiance

Using conservative estimates across three AI-informed models, I evaluated the consequences of a hypothetical protest campaign from April 5 to May 31, 2025.

Scenario 1 – Conservative Projection:
- Estimated Protesters: 420,000
- Arrest Risk: 7% (consistent with 2020 data)
- Projected Arrests: 23,520
- Key Difference: Unlike 2020, where many were held temporarily, the 2025 state response likely would not involve local jails. Detainees were predicted to be rerouted to private prisons, out-of-state facilities, or even overseas detention centers, enabled by new federal-state-private contracts.
Scenario 3 – Escalated Threat Model:
- Includes all of Scenario 1 outcomes
- Triggers a false flag event, prompting a declaration of quasi-martial law that would be coined “Investment(s).”
- Projected Detentions by May 31: 115,000
- Includes temporary suspension of habeas corpus, domestic military deployments, and mass surveillance intensification

By choosing not to protest en masse, Black communities have preemptively avoided both the material harm of detention and the symbolic violence of being cast as destabilizers.

4. Evolution in Resistance: Beyond the Streets

This resistance isn’t passive. It’s an evolution of strategy—shifting from visibility to survivability, from spectacle to systems change.

Digital Mobilization:
Platforms like newbeings1619.us facilitate secure, decentralized organizing, circumventing state surveillance.
Economic Disruption: Through targeted boycotts and mutual aid ecosystems, activists are rerouting power and resources from oppressive systems to community resilience. Girlcott.
Narrative Control: Rather than reacting to provocation, Black-led movements are reframing the story. They’re centering legacy, longevity, and liberation.
Soulution Cipher: A collaborative process among healed Black Americans to crowdsource, refine, and implement community solutions. Blending SWOT analysis, brainstorming, debate, and AI tools, it channels cultural strengths—creativity, resilience, and charisma—into actionable plans. The process ends with collective voting, execution, and a debrief for continuous improvement.

“Like withholding oxygen from a flame, non-participation starves the spectacle. Strategic restraint in 2025 suffocates all that was to incinerate us.” – Rev. Futurist Erskine Matthews

Conclusion: Strategy as Salvation

History may not bear witness to grand marches this year. But what it will record is something far more subversive: the withholding of legitimacy from a system designed to weaponize visibility.

Project 2025 seeks chaos to justify control. Black America has denied it that chaos.

Join the evolution. Visit newbeings1619.us.
“Marching in this climate is like walking into a burning house hoping your screams will put out the fire—brave, but doomed from the start.” — Rev. Futurist Erskine Matthews.

Sources